Sunday, October 11, 2009

Steve Bateman' s: Opponets spread rumors on a lawsuit and legal terms for the layperson.



  • The other canidates made up form.  Which stops in telling the whole truth.


Real document from court.  This shows all legal functions in this case.  We will below, give you the meaning of some legal terms that may help you understand.  Below this document is a made up version on what the opposition placed on thier blog.  Not real it was made up.  Anyone can see this. 


Now, legal lesson on terms and how the proces works.
Summons was the first document placed on thier document.
  • A  Summons is a legal document needed for any complaintto be  filed. It states how many days you have to answer the complaint.
  • Complaint is a legal document that starts the process of a law suit against one party or multiple parties.
  • Service Returned: The Batemans were never served so it gets returned.  This neans that the Batemans were deprived in thier rights to answer the complaint in a timely fashion.  No one can be deprived of life, liberty or property without "due process of law:" This is according to our Consitution.  In order for a suit to be legal everyone has the right to "due process" as per the 5th Admendment Rights given to all.  Since they were never served properly thier right were then violated.
  • Motion for Default:  The party that could not serve the other party, usually goes back into court to ask for a Motion for Default or any other Motion.  A Motion is a legal document that list what releif is sought by the moving party.  In this case American Express.  This usually happens.  A Default means that the person or persons did not show up in court and usually the judge will give whatever the moving party is asking for (American Express, is the moving party for this matter). 
  • Default: Just saying that the case was settled by default.  This is were the other blogger stops.  Look again at the real one. 
The real one goes further to show that another Motion was filed. It did not just stop with a default against the Batemans.  It shows that the Batemans hired an attorney after they found out about this legal matter.
  • Many courts and attorney's don't really like defaults because they can be reopened because :
  • Due Process righs were not followed.  The Defandents attorney can always ask for a Motion as follows;
  • excusable neglect
    n. a legitimate excuse for the failure of a party or his/her lawyer to take required action (like filing an answer to a complaint) on time. This is usually claimed to set aside a default judgment for failure to answer (or otherwise respond) in the period set by law. Illness, press of business by the lawyer (but not necessarily the defendant), or an understandable oversight by the lawyer's staff ("just blame the secretary") are common excuses which the courts will often accept. However, if the defendant loses the complaint or fails to call his/her attorney the courts will be less lenient. In any event, the defendant must also show he/she had some worthwhile defense.
  • It usally works.  No judge wants his case to go to appeal for default.
  • The Batemans as by the real document shows they are working to have this legal mess finished in a law of Court.
No one even knows why this happened.  It could be a purchased for this sum of money or less, yes less and the Batemans were trying to work with the credit card company.  Oh, by the way everyone thinks that American Express has to be paid off at time of billing.  That is not true.  Usually anything between 500.00 dollars and upward there is a payment plan as with other credit card companies have. 
The product could have been defective.  Mail was late, they were away on vacation.  Anything could have happened. 
 
You Don't accuse someone without all the facts. Especially not telling all the facts.  REMEMBER, WE ARE ALL INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.
 
This is how the opponents work here in Homestead. Looking out for themselves, spreading rumors.  We give the truth for all to see.  Not hear say. 

23 comments:

  1. Nice Mayor to do such a thing. Thanks for explaining it where we can all understand. Everyone has problems but you cant blame if you can not show facts. Were the heck were you when we had that little chubby spanish woman and this mayor running. Eyes are watching, Thanks for bringing out facts and not rumors great site.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Gald to see what Homestead voted for. Keep us updated. Is there anymore we need to see really?

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Misleading campaign " is the mayors middle name. Now that she is in power, she and those who benefit from her being there will stop at nothing. We only thought it could not get any worse than the Fab 5.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ring the Bell how many rounds do you think till a tko, go get them. Finally a real blog

    ReplyDelete
  5. some people have way too much time on their hands... really? what the ___ does Donna Bateman's credit card have to do with ANYTHING???

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dont know, ask the opposition who placed it on their blog first. Dirty people and it takes someone to clear the facts I guess. Pose that question to the Mayor.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Boy, do I ever wish for the good old boys back again. Wish I could vote in the election but live in unincooperated Dade County but I do all shopping in Homestead and Florida City. They are using my tax dollars to outsource to Hialeah.
    Thanks Linda Bell for putting Homestead people out of work.
    Guess that is what happens when your only exposer to public service is a cashier at Winn Dixie.

    ReplyDelete
  8. There is no final judgment in Donna Bateman's case. Only motions are listed in this report, which is the standard process in any credit card diispute. If these people had ANY idea what they are talking about, surely, they would realize this is NOT newsworthy. Do we really need to examine all the financial status of each candidate, their spouses, etc? Will need more blog space to accomodate all that useless information! Personally, I dont want to hear about it, and I am quite sure most of the candidates DO NOT want their dirty laundry aired either...

    ReplyDelete
  9. I am sure they dont,but the opposing team keeps wanting to make rumors and are guilty of sending mailings to thier candidate running agianst them, so I can only say hip hip hurray for at least the truth is being shown. No you are correct no Final Judgmet,they only show default letting people believe this candidate fouled up somewhere. They wont stop at anything so I am glade to see someone keeps up with the truth. go to www.kromeavekronicles I think that is were it talks about false rumors only not facts.

    ReplyDelete
  10. THE CAMPAIGN FOR BETTER JUDGEMENTOctober 11, 2009 at 12:14 PM

    THIS IS WHAT I POSTED ON THAT OTHER SITE BUT I HAVE A FEELING THAT THE CREEP THAT RUNS THE BLOG AKA VEGA WON'T HAVE THE BALLS TO POST THE TRUTH. WIMP!

    HERE IT GOES:
    This is a falsefied legal document that is posted on this blog. I have advised the Batemans to take legal action against You and this smear campaign. I want to inform LB that Mrs. Bateman is none of your business, as Mr. Bell is none of ours. You'll probably be picking on the Bateman's autistic son next.
    There is an ongoing dispute with American express, But I can prove that the Batemans have never defaulted on anything before and have retained a lawyer that will have this matter resolved within the month. It is no one's business when legal proceedings are taking place.
    You act as if NO ONE has ever had a dispute with a credit card company before. What a crock of crap! If this is all you've got, than you ain't got much! I'd watch my back, lawyers like to sue over stuff like this...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Bet they did not post it. Dirty politics ha,at this blog gets facts.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Alex Diaz de Villegas is the owner of the krome ave smut blog. What a great guy, NOT!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Whos is Alex de Villegas anyway and what does he know? Apparently those who speak before verifying facts, and those who misrepresent facts, are the morons. Dont worry though, the Batemans are good people, and they will take good care of this creep. After all, FAIR is FAIR. Can we cut the slander and mud slinging and stick to what really matters? Which I believe is trusting people to do the right thing. So what if someone has a credit card problem? Does that mean their spouse is a bad choice for leader? No, it does not. There is certainly much evidence that Lynda Bell has her share of issues as well, and so do her children. If you really want to know the truth, just stick to the facts and mind you own business. This is why I never believed in blogs before. I do, however, believe in the freedoms that this country has guaranteed us, the right to feedom of speech, etc. So say what you feel you must, hoping you can sleep at night, poisoning the minds of the lay people who dont understand half of this anyway... Those that actually know where to find this info and verify it, are SURELY the ones will make the best decisions on election day. Thank you for allowing me to vent!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anyone who has ever had a special needs child knows how challenging that can be, especially when you are under emotional distress! Austin Bateman is one of the best cared for children around! His parents are loving, compassionate and very appropriate with him! Kathleen was proud of her son and grandson, and is surely watching over them from Heaven, let the woman rest in peace!

    ReplyDelete
  16. gossiper! dont talk about things you know nothing of.

    ReplyDelete
  17. You must be the same low life, dragging the man's wife, child and decesaed mother into this nonsense... Shame on you!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hospital has xrays of his sons shoulder. ask around losers. Yes repeat child abuse put Batemen under a bridge.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Perhaps you have not heard of a little thing called HIPPA... Of course there are many ways a child can injure a shoulder!

    ReplyDelete
  20. What slander to say that about his child. If there was any harm believe me the child protective agency would have taken him away. your the kind of people who do that sourght of thing and waste valuable time on nothing but rumors to slander a man. and autistic children do have a tendoncy to hurt them selves. I am in the medical field with disabled children. So learn the facts and stop spreading rumors.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I want an A High School. CSUSA has the capacity to bring it here to our hometown. Mr Bateman has assured me that is his intention. We deserve an A school, people moving to any area ask " what are the schools like?" What can we tell them? What has Bell given us, Nothing!!!! We need real change. I want it now!

    ReplyDelete
  22. why would DCF be called? She is not afraid of him, or anyone, you fools. If the hospital had any suspicion of abuse, they are MANDATED REPORTERS, and would have immediately called the Abuse Hotline for investigation.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Wow !!!These posts are disgusting.This is what really negative campaigning is all about .Why is it that anybody ask about .The Garzo's and they support Judy Waldman and Steve Shelley..I guess Voter fraud is in the rise here in homestead....So,Why is The Garzo's investing so much with these candidates .You heard it here first ,of course Contracts once they get elected.Now that's the truth

    ReplyDelete